Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.
Identifieur interne : 000008 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000007; suivant : 000009Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.
Auteurs : Nianxun Xi [République populaire de Chine] ; Juliette M G. Bloor [France] ; Chengjin Chu [République populaire de Chine]Source :
- Annals of botany [ 1095-8290 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Growing evidence suggests that the net effect of soil microbes on plants depends on both abiotic and biotic conditions, but the context-dependency of soil feedback effects remains poorly understood. Here we test for interactions between the presence of conspecific soil microbes, plant competition and light availability on tree seedling performance.
METHODS
Seedlings of two congeneric tropical tree species, Bauhinia brachycarpa and Bauhinia variegata, were grown in either sterilized soil or soil conditioned by conspecific soil microorganisms in a two-phase greenhouse feedback experiment. We examined the interactive effects of soil treatment (live, sterilized), light availability (low, high) and plant competition (no competition, intraspecific and interspecific competition) on tree seedling biomass. We also investigated the linkages between the outcomes of soil feedback effects and soil microbial community structure.
KEY RESULTS
The outcomes of soil feedback effects on seedling biomass varied depending on both competition treatment and light availability. Under low light conditions, soil feedback effects were neutral irrespective of competition treatment and plant species. Soil feedback effects were negative in high light for seedlings with interspecific competition, but positive for seedlings growing alone or with intraspecific competition. Soil feedback effects for seedlings were driven by variation in the Gram-positive:Gram-negative bacteria ratio. Light and conspecific soil microbes had interactive effects on the competitive environment experienced by tree species; in low light the presence of conspecific soil microbes decreased plant competition intensity, whereas in high light both the intensity and the importance of competition increased for seedlings in the presence of soil microbes, irrespective of plant species.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings underline the importance of light and plant competition for the outcomes of soil feedback effects on young tree seedlings, and suggest that reduced light availability may reduce the influence of conspecific soil microbes on plant-plant interactions.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa134
PubMed: 32686833
PubMed Central: PMC7596364
Affiliations:
- France, République populaire de Chine
- Auvergne (région administrative), Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Guangdong
- Clermont-Ferrand, Jiangmen
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.</title><author><name sortKey="Xi, Nianxun" sort="Xi, Nianxun" uniqKey="Xi N" first="Nianxun" last="Xi">Nianxun Xi</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Jiangmen</settlement><region type="province">Guangdong</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bloor, Juliette M G" sort="Bloor, Juliette M G" uniqKey="Bloor J" first="Juliette M G" last="Bloor">Juliette M G. Bloor</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>INRAE, VetAgro-Sup, UREP, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>INRAE, VetAgro-Sup, UREP, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont-Ferrand</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes</region><region type="old region">Auvergne (région administrative)</region><settlement type="city">Clermont-Ferrand</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chu, Chengjin" sort="Chu, Chengjin" uniqKey="Chu C" first="Chengjin" last="Chu">Chengjin Chu</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Jiangmen</settlement><region type="province">Guangdong</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:32686833</idno><idno type="pmid">32686833</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcaa134</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC7596364</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000016</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000016</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000016</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000016</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000016</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.</title><author><name sortKey="Xi, Nianxun" sort="Xi, Nianxun" uniqKey="Xi N" first="Nianxun" last="Xi">Nianxun Xi</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Jiangmen</settlement><region type="province">Guangdong</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bloor, Juliette M G" sort="Bloor, Juliette M G" uniqKey="Bloor J" first="Juliette M G" last="Bloor">Juliette M G. Bloor</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>INRAE, VetAgro-Sup, UREP, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>INRAE, VetAgro-Sup, UREP, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont-Ferrand</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes</region><region type="old region">Auvergne (région administrative)</region><settlement type="city">Clermont-Ferrand</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chu, Chengjin" sort="Chu, Chengjin" uniqKey="Chu C" first="Chengjin" last="Chu">Chengjin Chu</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Jiangmen</settlement><region type="province">Guangdong</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annals of botany</title><idno type="eISSN">1095-8290</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</b></p><p>Growing evidence suggests that the net effect of soil microbes on plants depends on both abiotic and biotic conditions, but the context-dependency of soil feedback effects remains poorly understood. Here we test for interactions between the presence of conspecific soil microbes, plant competition and light availability on tree seedling performance.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Seedlings of two congeneric tropical tree species, Bauhinia brachycarpa and Bauhinia variegata, were grown in either sterilized soil or soil conditioned by conspecific soil microorganisms in a two-phase greenhouse feedback experiment. We examined the interactive effects of soil treatment (live, sterilized), light availability (low, high) and plant competition (no competition, intraspecific and interspecific competition) on tree seedling biomass. We also investigated the linkages between the outcomes of soil feedback effects and soil microbial community structure.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>KEY RESULTS</b></p><p>The outcomes of soil feedback effects on seedling biomass varied depending on both competition treatment and light availability. Under low light conditions, soil feedback effects were neutral irrespective of competition treatment and plant species. Soil feedback effects were negative in high light for seedlings with interspecific competition, but positive for seedlings growing alone or with intraspecific competition. Soil feedback effects for seedlings were driven by variation in the Gram-positive:Gram-negative bacteria ratio. Light and conspecific soil microbes had interactive effects on the competitive environment experienced by tree species; in low light the presence of conspecific soil microbes decreased plant competition intensity, whereas in high light both the intensity and the importance of competition increased for seedlings in the presence of soil microbes, irrespective of plant species.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>Our findings underline the importance of light and plant competition for the outcomes of soil feedback effects on young tree seedlings, and suggest that reduced light availability may reduce the influence of conspecific soil microbes on plant-plant interactions.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="In-Data-Review" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">32686833</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>04</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1095-8290</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>126</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>Oct</Month><Day>30</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Annals of botany</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ann Bot</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1089-1098</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1093/aob/mcaa134</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND AND AIMS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Growing evidence suggests that the net effect of soil microbes on plants depends on both abiotic and biotic conditions, but the context-dependency of soil feedback effects remains poorly understood. Here we test for interactions between the presence of conspecific soil microbes, plant competition and light availability on tree seedling performance.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Seedlings of two congeneric tropical tree species, Bauhinia brachycarpa and Bauhinia variegata, were grown in either sterilized soil or soil conditioned by conspecific soil microorganisms in a two-phase greenhouse feedback experiment. We examined the interactive effects of soil treatment (live, sterilized), light availability (low, high) and plant competition (no competition, intraspecific and interspecific competition) on tree seedling biomass. We also investigated the linkages between the outcomes of soil feedback effects and soil microbial community structure.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="KEY RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The outcomes of soil feedback effects on seedling biomass varied depending on both competition treatment and light availability. Under low light conditions, soil feedback effects were neutral irrespective of competition treatment and plant species. Soil feedback effects were negative in high light for seedlings with interspecific competition, but positive for seedlings growing alone or with intraspecific competition. Soil feedback effects for seedlings were driven by variation in the Gram-positive:Gram-negative bacteria ratio. Light and conspecific soil microbes had interactive effects on the competitive environment experienced by tree species; in low light the presence of conspecific soil microbes decreased plant competition intensity, whereas in high light both the intensity and the importance of competition increased for seedlings in the presence of soil microbes, irrespective of plant species.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Our findings underline the importance of light and plant competition for the outcomes of soil feedback effects on young tree seedlings, and suggest that reduced light availability may reduce the influence of conspecific soil microbes on plant-plant interactions.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Xi</LastName><ForeName>Nianxun</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bloor</LastName><ForeName>Juliette M G</ForeName><Initials>JMG</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>INRAE, VetAgro-Sup, UREP, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chu</LastName><ForeName>Chengjin</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Ann Bot</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0372347</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0305-7364</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Light intensity</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">conspecific soil microbes</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">plant competition</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">plant–soil feedbacks</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">seedling biomass</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pmc-release"><Year>2021</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32686833</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">5873695</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1093/aob/mcaa134</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7596364</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 10;5:18032</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26658882</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 02;6:1360</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26869996</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2637-49</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23431594</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 May;9(5):191-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21236818</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2017 Oct;216(1):90-98</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28608591</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):147-158</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28549080</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):29-38</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28444363</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2017 Sep;215(4):1413-1424</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28621813</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02810</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31282992</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):91-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30451287</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 16;9(1):2738</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30013066</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2019 Aug;22(8):1274-1284</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31149765</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>ISME J. 2017 Feb;11(2):584-587</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27612291</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Front Microbiol. 2013 Sep 05;4:265</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24032030</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):67-70</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11986666</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(2):408-23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24995955</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2018 Feb 12;121(2):311-319</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29329376</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Ecol. 2014 Jul;102(4):845-856</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25253908</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Ecol. 2018 Aug 13;106(5):1853-1863</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30765896</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 28;1(6):150</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28812635</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2015 Sep;96(9):2523-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26594708</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Clim Chang. 2018 Oct;8(10):885-889</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30288176</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2002 Jun 20;417(6891):844-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12075350</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Microb Ecol. 1998 May;35(3):265-78</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9569284</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>AoB Plants. 2014 Nov 24;7:</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25425557</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2016 Apr;90(6):575-87</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26729479</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02590</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30730041</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):577-587</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30067296</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2010 Aug 5;466(7307):752-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20581819</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 10;16(1):122</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27287440</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Evol Biol. 2019 May;32(5):438-450</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30739360</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2008 Sep;11(9):980-92</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18522641</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2010 Mar;13(3):394-407</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20100237</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2018 Aug;21(8):1268-1281</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29896848</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>France</li><li>République populaire de Chine</li></country><region><li>Auvergne (région administrative)</li><li>Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes</li><li>Guangdong</li></region><settlement><li>Clermont-Ferrand</li><li>Jiangmen</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="République populaire de Chine"><region name="Guangdong"><name sortKey="Xi, Nianxun" sort="Xi, Nianxun" uniqKey="Xi N" first="Nianxun" last="Xi">Nianxun Xi</name></region><name sortKey="Chu, Chengjin" sort="Chu, Chengjin" uniqKey="Chu C" first="Chengjin" last="Chu">Chengjin Chu</name></country><country name="France"><region name="Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes"><name sortKey="Bloor, Juliette M G" sort="Bloor, Juliette M G" uniqKey="Bloor J" first="Juliette M G" last="Bloor">Juliette M G. Bloor</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/TreeMicInterV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000008 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000008 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= TreeMicInterV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:32686833
|texte= Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:32686833" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a TreeMicInterV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |